of5story~full-time employees is half what a lunch why?

Commercial - Business & Economics | | 0 views

In the midst of dignity’ serialization of column ‘haken!

As for details from this

5th story
Why the regular member the noon being half price?

Before the large you eat the noon at the usual fixed food house and impair, are accompanied in the employee dining room ahead dispatching (“S&F”).So….

“Here you do not eat! Because the regular member Calais of 350 Yen, us outside (haken) costs also 700 Yen of time, is”

If you look at the Calais sample which appears in the picture, 700 Yen are high! If 700 Yen it puts out, katsukare eating with kokoichi, hanging comes out.
Although there is an employee dining room, the reason whose coefficient of use of haken is low was well recognized.

That it sets aside, why is the regular member probably half price what?

Lunch is offered cheaply as a part of the welfare for the employee.Well enough there is a company which adopts this.
If the lunch is asked through the company, being cheap, you can buy when.Furthermore 1 months’s amount collecting also the payment, if with deferred payment it is deducted from allowance and there is such system it is delightful, is, don’t you think?.

“About the noon stinginess stinginess do, payment in full bearing at the company,” with thinking, perhaps, either ru one, it is by chance, but when lunch is provided from the company, as a wage in kind income tax it is to impose a tax.

In order not to impose a tax as an allowance, if you say to the can tongue

1. The employee has borne above half price
2.burden of the company1months1per capita3,500up to ¥

determined that there is a, case has been provided in this range is often.

for more information click here
when you paid a meal (takkusuansa/internal revenue service)

i know this relationship is often, can be used, such as convenience stores and family restaurant, voucher persons who are paid.
1months worth of voucher spelling of, 7,000¥ do not?
why7,000′m yen? and, who secretly thought to question…they have solved the mystery.

for example, from salary meals as3,500if you have yen will be deducted, of the difference3,500company has to bear the yen. speaking in accounts welfare costs the problem is that you recorded as expenses, etc..

in this way desuga, that the company is actually much to bear, do they really have to bear the first place, if you know clearly is less.
for example, lunch is1how much food, also has been decided, that is how much they paid to those of ordinary skill in lunch box, i do not know and i who are not responsible for accounting and administrative….
the reason the market is cheaper than, s not because the company has to bear some, for example, because you order a fixed number of daily, maybe because that makes it easy to buy from an individual.

S&F of full-time employees half also, employees company has to pay me half you might believe that, it is probably the difference.
because, employees every day to eat curry every day350if the yen to pay the company, to burden the company1months3,500because it would exceed it lightly on the rules of the income tax act up to ¥.

given that outsourcing the management of the canteen, full-time employees50%OFFthere is a system to ensure only. amount actually paid to the contractor, 700instead of the yen should be easy to more.
if, simply revenue if you are passing the, to full- half trying to sell in, regular price dispatch?trying to sell in, consignment cost of sales and is to be involved in, S&F does not bear the expense is.

well, for employees, if you have eaten lunch cheaply, i a good thing either.

anyway…per full the cost of temporarily curry280assuming the yen,

S&F curry canteen income

also cost the same but also the taste of curry, hegemony and profit eat3double! it is a terrible little i earn less income in the dispatch…ohmae’s i do not eat here! you can also convinced that the attitude of stubborn(lol).

check the welfare of dispatch company! (work in the dispatch/guide article)

fringe benefits do you know? (accounting work/guide article)

column the dignity of hegemony Indexback to