Decipher the privatization of postal services in the logic watch the privatization of postal services triangular logic

Why, now being postal services commercialization?

First, you wrote on also the column of merumaga, but now it is in the midst of deliberating at the National Diet, attitude of the “postal services commercialization bill” is observed.But, there is an impression which just way and the deliberation where degree of interest of the citizen is low, furthermore, does not understand well is advanced in the citizen.

As expected, the merit of this commercialization being what? As for demerit being what? In addition, why, now, being commercialization? With simply and largest doubt are said, with technique of logic and technique of especially triangular logic, approaching, you think as like.

Basis of triangular logic

There is various techniques in logic, but the basis why “?” The “because” with there is the questioning which is said.To be large to the method of using the logic, separately 2 types, “why?”It raises the hypothesis which confronts, keeps demonstrating that, generally known “deduction” and, from the various data and observation of phenomenon, fixed law is discovered, there is with a “induction”.

Logic is something where become also business English lighting and the basis of the presentation, but this time, focusing on naze of postal services commercialization, practicing logical thinking, you will see.

It is interesting, inference of the Democratic party

As for the latest largest doubt, why, being “commercialization” first and starting and being? With it means saying.on this point, happened to the question in the house of representatives of the national assembly of destination, TVhave seen in, there was an inference was made to crawl and. inagaki was a question of the members of the democratic party, his, inference and hypothesis, why , why now the privatization of postal services? as the answer to the question of, when the privatization, postal services are privatized, amount of savings that (the current4easily exceed the amount of all deposits of large mega-) to the scale of, immediately, should be similar to private enterprise of criticism pressure.

moreover, other than postal mail, state having a delivery business, become a form of private financial institutions specializing in contravention of the provision clearly.

then, in turn, to take its integrity, rather than changing the postal corporation has been determined legal, rather, are required to private banks and other financial industry, specialized financial that is no longer forced to remove to reverse the legal bind that.

what happens when you, as a result, originally, financial institutions such as banks, that the corporation shall not retain non-financial business, full-time provision is that a released from. this, with a focus on bank, 1large financial conglomerate is that appearance is becoming.

*reference: liberalization of financial
and this adaptation is, from japanese companies should not be limited to, 2006will be constructed in the year of new companies act given coupled with the revision of the, be created that has dominated the japanese financial, inference was.

this financial conglomerate as the vanguard of the creation of, first we have the privatization of postal services, hypothesis that is, can say that there is compelling in its own way.

also, that hypothesis in order to temporarily is true, evidence inference there is a need to expand the. let’s watch it then in the form of a logic.

watch the triangular logic privatization of why?

is often used to illustrate the logic when, logic called triangular, is schematically.

this is, proposition (Propositon)after defining the, evidence of it in order to correct(Evidence)and based on it, a new inference(Reasoning)it is also that will need to be.

looks like the following: if the figure.

diet of this proposition in question, wonder what why there before privatization? when asked, the creation of financial conglomerates the hypothesis=proposition had been presented as. in, to support this, evidence is whether there is a problem then.

evidence:
1. benefits of privatization is not clear. therefore, national interest is low.
2. concrete management simulation for privatization is not clear.
3. the government, the above2point for, are not trying to do can not be explained.
4. that coincided with the establishment of the new companies act to facilitate the acquisition.
5. only stick to the time of privatization, not to mention that the results.

other, likeyou can raise the, looking at the above actions of the government,
then, based on this reasoning will be possible.

evidence of the above1. in, as far as i know, it has been shown as a benefit of the people, in a post office, there are only those of such kind can buy concert tickets. in answer, the word is used repeatedly, private with the word, be familiar to the private sector, they are all that should be provided better service. but, private to the, poor management and a clear, because it also contains up to bankruptcy, there is more risk of important. moreover, clear management plan to prevent it is not shown, after the, private effort in, in a word that is, the description does not become completely.

the company went bankrupt, i will try as private. in that ittenbari, theory is the same as not lending picture. pros and cons of privatization, there is concrete management plans and outlook, because it is the first time would have to be able to debate.

and, what is decisive in the end logic, is the consideration of the advantages and disadvantages. the following, who benefit from what? let’s view the point that!

benefits of the people is less?

this point, national, it is assumed there will be more disadvantages. the biggest advantage of postal savings, is that the money be deposited with confidence, this will be lost first. moreover, services as far, before the logical management of private, because it is intuitive that everyone should probably impossible to maintain and. (also, there is no concrete data that does not happen. )

then, most concrete contents, the bill also does not seem to think that after privatization of the country, why rush the passage of the bill, in addition to, and also because there is merit, not forced to infer. moreover, this is twisted logic i have. national and, outweigh the disadvantages of a country, beginning there are significant advantages, so beshi the privatization because it is should be the.

here privatization not be surprised if the purpose of the bill itself has been received to.

here, during the privatization, specialized financial if you look again the hypothesis that the goal is to remove the frame of, description in terms of fairly when it comes to possible.

moreover, if anything that would benefit financial institutions bank of japan, at first glance, it also seems likely, still, in japan, full-fledged financial conglomerate what will be, given that it does not exist, that already exist, overseas financial conglomerate be deployed in favor of is obvious. (daiwa securities smbc and is once, there was a report that will be integrated groups, it is not yet implemented. )

also, after the privatization of postal services, depending on how the partnership with other financial institutions, postal savings money is abundant, market and, has now been supported by only a vague expectation that flows to the private sector private many of the company, a new financial conglomerate it could also be only used as funding for the acquisition is.

moreover, of course the risk that this bill, not at all taking into account.

postal savings, japanese castle keep economic power?

or what to build next to this? leave is not clear that the vision, determined before the dismantling of the existing structure only, i have forwarded the, me as a very dangerous attempt, it seems.

originally, postal reform and, and special public corporations, should have are those of the fiscal investment and loan program in order to prevent sloppy by country. and its purpose is, it was supposed to be realized once in a public corporation. to rush toward privatization without being explicit in tangible benefits to this, persuasive, should be required with a clear reason.

the main enclosure of the reform if you try it and semeotoshi, in fact, support the economic powerhouse, the main enclosure of the country had semeotoshi the! only pray that you must not result in a.

for nan privatization why? the discussion went back to this origin, all means in the house of councilors, just hope. also, what there, because it is the role of the house of councillors should be.

-party interests rather than self-protection, it might be an excellent opportunity to assess the beliefs and aspirations politician tries to source truly responsible for the future of the country.

everyone also, this issue during the privatization of postal services, own reasoning and the hypothesis of yourselves, try building is a logical, what how?
are you, privatization why and how do you answer?

related article

thinking is logical and

what is the logic and? from the perspective of learning english

5seen in the minutes privatization of postal services

postal privatization debate is the important point!

(other articles guide)