The need for fire insurance1 no fire damage compensation also

In spread of fire damage! It can compensate can claim to the fire origin?

When it encountered to spread of fire damage in the fire from the neighboring house, just constructed the pad is burnt down? Of course, because it is to be the fire cause, you think that reparations obligations occur in the neighboring house, don’t you think?.In other words, you think that there is a responsibility which as before, rebuilds the pad probably will be.

Even if, when damage is given to others, the effect which owes the responsibility of particular illegal behavior has been decided also the te, even in 709 provisions of civil law not to be purposely.Don’t you think? “compensation” it is something which is called “compensation”.
However, this, in the fire it is to be the story which does not pass.That is special law of civil law, stipulation of civil law 709 provision has designated the fire as exception “the law regarding the responsibility of misfire”, with alias misfire method, it is decided that it owes reparations obligation to the misfire person only when there is a “serious mistake”.

Even with when is not fault completely by your, unilaterally there is cause in the partner, is not the case that always it can receive compensation, -.This, in with who with wake something whose fire insurance is necessary the shank.

The reason where misfire method is possible

As for this law being possible 1899.old wooden houses in japan are often, there was a background of fire and damage is inevitable once the fire out. origin of a fire and made it himself although the cause of the fire, fire accidents can happen to anyone even if you care. person has lost any property by fire and, it all saddled up to the responsibility of the fire damage despite the, because it is too heavy too, this act is arranged as.

now, what concerns me is gross negligence (= gross negligence also known as) negligence is not a transport layer (= slight negligence this is called) what is not a turning point of. whether the cause of the obligation to compensate tens of millions of yen are also, case to become a fire source, regardless to which fire, for the future of the household is a serious problem equivalent.

on the next page slight negligence and gross negligence i will explain the difference of >>

slight negligence and gross negligence the difference is

first slight negligence it is called, careless mistake that would cause anyone about. that is, fire due to negligence and light, for example, forgetting to turn off the stove (note: but this is not necessarily, is a case-by-case basis by the individual specific situations) refers to the fire a little carelessness, such as has occurred in the original. in that case, can give the fire damage to neighbors, liability does not occur.

on the other hand gross negligence and is, deliberately (= purpose this is called) is not the case in, it did not pay serious attention must be vigilant in. by, and fire caused by gross negligence is, can result in serious if you do not pay attention can be assumed in spite of sufficient, is that the fire occurred because it failed to. according to the precedents of the past, fire was caused by the accident that left the field while heating the cooking oil has been recognized as gross negligence. in this case, misfire is not responsible for the application of, it is not cause liability for compensation to the linker.

also, the gas explosion accident due, subject to liability law will not misfire. when given the damage caused by the explosion next door is therefore, compensation must be.

by any chance, once the home has become the fire

home becomes the origin of a fire emergency, if liability has occurred to the linker certified gross negligence, it will give the catastrophic damage to the household of my house.

in these cases, personal liability insurance, authorized personal liability insurance and other are set to fire or force will be. it stipulates that the money does not pay the insurance personal liability insurance is, only by the insured deliberately. liability caused by gross negligence are covered by the payment of insurance. will be compensated in accordance with the explosion.

it should be noted, people who are causing the fire to the living rental, after damage to the building?
in this case, the tenant has signed a lease agreement with building owner is not obligated to return back to the original building (= restitution obligation this is called) there are, compensation must be. in case these, the fire insurance liability insurance tenant has been set, i mean that is the agreement when the lease contract.

(related links) choose their own fire insurance
select save overhead fire insurance
misfire law what is?
why go to the fire insurance?