pink flyer every possible means to reduce the posting

The person who the reader even in has been bothered in the pink leaflet, is not to be many, probably will be? With your home where the child which is in the midst of especially attending school is, in regard to education, you think that the one which you feel that it is not desirable, is not less.If for example they are door-to-door sales as “the customer who is not caused”, the fixed invasion prevention effect can be expected with the automatic lock.But, when it becomes the harmful leaflet, in fact, as for the step which denies mailing the fact that it does not exist is actuality.You called nighttime or weekend, aiming for the opening where the curator is not, you coming, it is not to be possible either how to do.

To tell the truth, April 11th of this year, one decision was put out with the judgment which is related to the handbill distributing.Vis-a-vis the handbill distributing to the multiple dwelling house, it meant that the Supreme Court which is the highest prefecture of administration of justice for the first time shows fixed judgment.As for the result, very much, being interesting ones, assistance it is expected that you buy to also leaflet repulse.You think as like then concerning all conceivable means this time, mixes the judicial precedent and the like of such lawsuit, decreases mailing the pink leaflet thinking.

Whether leaflet distribution corresponds to “house invasion crime”, issue

This time, those where it has become the stage of the lawsuit which is related to the handbill distributing, are the Self Defense Force official residence which is Tokyo Tachikawa city.to appeal against the troop dispatch to iraq, 2004years1month~2of civil society organizations during the mon3name is to inspect the site of the former defense agency, tachikawa dormitory without permission, opposite of self-defense forces to send troops to iraq! was mailed to the newspaper by the front door of the villa was described as such. in contrast, the residents were subjected to measures such as to report to the police, submit a damage report from that there are no such act is likely to be discontinued. this, now to open the curtain and play a series of trial.

that it was at issue in this trial, may enter premises without permission in order to distribute the flyers burglary crime whether it was appropriate to point. in the past, in kanagawa prefecture1998years5month, or been arrested in the act of committing a crime of breaking and entering part-time job a man entered the premises of others will kubaro the pink flyer, in setagaya ward, tokyo2003years1month, as a pink flyer handed out to residents mansion also, on suspicion of violating the nuisance ordinance, tokyo43there was an incident-year-old man is arrested in the tokyo metropolitan police department. 2002years10nuisance ordinance was amended in may, located in the background that pink flyer distribution becomes the target of criminal penalties.

but, i seek legal judgment in place of the judiciary this is the first time, attention had gathered in the contents of that judgment. this lawsuit has been tabled until the supreme court. really, what reached the end what? next page from, let’s take a look at step-by-step.

a lower court decision is not guilty freedom of expression are respected

first, in the hachioji branch of the tokyo district court is a court2004years12month, acquittal has been sentenced. although formally it is determined that it falls under the crime of trespassing, then from the point of view of the entire law and order, that there is about the legality of criminal deserves punishment is not permitted it is the reason that the main decision.

in the case of this, unauthorized off limits to the shared part invasion of privacy is determined that the low degree of, than to protect the peaceful life of residents, freedom of expression (in this case is asked to send troops to iraq) with an emphasis on position that that should be respected but was affected.

therefore, plaintiff was dissatisfied with this result the appeal, stage was moved to the tokyo high court trial followed by two. on appeal to one’s astonishment, turn, conviction is sentenced, became a court appearance is a result of rejected (2005years12mon judgment) .

that became the turning point of the judgment, considering the severity of damage to residents, there is a real harm to the point seriously. penetrate to the location where you want to manage others without permission, acts threatening the peaceful lives of residents, expression of political opinion that”freedom of expression”must be security and superiority in respect to, it depends on the high court that there was a judgment such as. established as a requirement of the crime of trespassing, consideration the degree of anxiety and discomfort suffered by residents (consideration) and take the contents was also suggested that. residents for damage is now pleased with the results.

off limits without permission of flyers for distribution burglary crime corresponding to

however, 3defendant is dissatisfied with the result of this appeal as, now be carried over until the dispute is finally the supreme court. just, it was the final battle was to welcome. but, statue of angel smiled to residents still damage. in the supreme court appeal is dismissed, two lower court decision (10million yen or20punished by a fine of ten thousand yen) now is to be finalized (2008years4mon judgment) .

from the above, look like the following conclusions and to organize.

this time a series of trial, sometimes it is the contents of the flyer to send troops to iraq, there are aspects of pink and posting flyers is difficult to simply compare. but, the supreme court expression itself (=contents of the leaflet) or worthy of punishment, rather than being questioned is, means of expression, deserve to be punished whether intrusive without permission for flyer distribution has come into question, ie we explained. freedom of expression while respecting the, that means that prejudice the rights of others are not allowed i have concluded that. this point is, considered a flyer can also be applied to hazardous.

need help to residents of the apartment is pink flyer, first, supreme court”sided”keep aware of the fact that. alone there is a precedent, it considers help to strengthen the unity of management association. based on the above, next page pink leaflets repel law in concrete (draft) i would like to introduce the.

post a sign to prohibit the posting flyers pink

tachikawa quarters of the former defense agency became the stage of turmoil is, prohibitions in the dormitory as

-non-official, enter an area that
activities such as distributing propaganda villa billposting
· stalls (occupancy of the land) such as a hard-sell sales and goods by
parking of vehicles,
other, nuisance to human

things such as posting content, of some building1was affixed to the wall at the top of the post-floor doorway and set. these points have been identified in the course of the trial the facts accurately, intrusion = intervene against the will of management rights also on the pack off limits without permission of the relationship between the act and purpose flyer distribution, the bulletin is believed one has become an important element.

there, management as a union eradication pink flyer gesture as a way of, you could take a look at creating and posting materials posted sang a ban on posting. below (draft) it will introduce, suitably tailored to the circumstances of each management association, we would like to modify your advantage.