ruisho yourself in the fire origin…liability is not a? 1

Natural disaster is one of the disasters which of course fear also fire very.According to the statistics of general affairs economical fire fighting agency as for 1 rank of fire break-out cause “arson” and 2 rank “the cookstove” and 3 rank as for the tobacco and 4 rank have become doubt of arson, n/a edition fire fighting white paper).

Concerning arson that it prevents and the way it is not, thinks the person who it is, probably will be, but even then as for being possible by your there is Sawayama. The check seat and the like of general affairs economical fire fighting agency please try utilizing.

Concerning the tobacco of 3 rank, because it does not inhale, the person who says it is, probably will be, but by his will not produce the fire and being the te and the times when to burn it moves from the house (or room) of next door will note.

Then you think that damage it should have had compensating to the partner, probably will be, but in case of fire usual compensation for damage accident and circumstance differ a little.This time burning down from the house of others, the home burnt, (or conversely the house of the partner was burnt) will verify the compensation for damage and insurance when concerning theme.

Civil law 709 provision and misfire responsible method (misfire method)

First you will verify concerning the relationship of the law which first it is related to misfire responsible method (misfire method).

* Civil law 709 provision
Right of others is infringed intention or with mistake and appointing to the blame which the barrel person occurs with this and compensates barrel damage

the difficult words are written in small, put simply, please damages is that the opponent if i was causing trouble to people such as their own fault. social and moral responsibility is, of course, not have been established is that there is a legal responsibility.

and is a familiar example is if you have an injury to person or in a traffic accident, it is responsible for the perpetrator it is a matter of course.

but, if you ruisho around by misfire, there is one other kind of law has been implicated in this other.

accountability act of misfire (abbreviation: liability act misfire or misfire law ) >
of the civil code709article the provisions of misfire in the case of this does not apply a. when the barrel has become critical to an accidental fire is negligence and not to this but as long as.

accountability act of misfire (liability act misfire, misfire law) law is only a very short sentence of this. typically the civil code709as defined in article, please damages when they called to disturb others by their own fault, such as the principle. but misfire (fire) in the case of the, has not to apply this principle as described above (except in the case of gross negligence) .

this is the meiji32is the old law was enacted in the year, even now has been applied. the idea, in japan, wooden houses and narrow dense to land, at the living environment and is easily spread and fire, it put the onus on the house of the person who is on fire, etc. like they lost a home far beyond the capacity compensationthere seems to be a background.

this law has been or match to the idea of japan’s current environment aside, we must be aware that there are these provisions.

on the next page is a misfire liability act (misfire law) concept of gross negligence and will discuss>>

method is a misfire, there is a prerequisite to compensation for damages to opponent bothered, accidental fire (fire) i go to the case of this provision will not fit. exceptions have been established and do the damages if there is gross negligence to the person who started the fire but have provided.

what worries me is there become serious negligence (gross negligence) what i? will be called. such as the following is described briefly and.

usually, without any attention until told to people arekore, state, such as a lack of attention to this overlooked but vaguely understood that these would result in easily if you have the slightest attention

once left for the state, for example, a result of it you leave them alone but who could see that dangerous, it is the case, such as those happening around ruisho fire.

the main case of gross negligence

let’s ask a few questions about cases that have been qualified for gross negligence in the precedents of the past concrete.

fried in tempura
between its flammable leaves play while the pan was heated at the stove cooking oil put a housewife

heating appliance (while sleeping)
the flash fire to futon moeutsu~tsu was lying asleep on a futon with a electric stove

tobacco sleep
inca sleep tobacco, fire

since these pieces is one of the precedentalthough it is on a case-by-case basis by the case of, i think it dangerous if i called to let him know, and certainly. i think about things like risk within the scope of common-sense is if you need to be careful from this sense.

relationship of legal responsibility in front of the fire insurance (liability law, such as accidental fire) it is important to understand the.
this continued, ruisho yourself in the fire origin…liability is not a? 2 from here to

Incoming search terms:

• accidental fire liability (1)